Ownership

Community ownership: the quiet metric

A year-end review surfaces the metric we don’t usually track — how much of the work the community now owns.

AuthorPaulina Mlinga
Published09 Dec 2025
ProjectEpiC · Lindi
Read4 min
Field Dispatch
6
Councils with KVP committees
72
KVP representatives seated
18
Council-led decisions
100%
Quarterly meeting cadence
01

What ownership looks like

Community ownership is easy to invoke and hard to operationalise. In EpiC the operational definition is concrete: a KVP coordination committee exists in every council, KVP representatives sit on that committee with voice and vote, and the committee meets quarterly with a published agenda and minutes.

By mid-2025 all six EpiC councils had functioning KVP committees with seventy-two KVP representatives seated across the six councils.

02

Decisions that came from the room

Eighteen council-level operational decisions originated from the KVP committees during the year, including the renegotiation of facility opening hours in two councils, the relocation of one drop-in centre, and the introduction of a third gender-friendly entrance at a primary facility.

These decisions are small individually and structural collectively.

03

The accountability dividend

The unexpected outcome is upward accountability — KVP representatives now hold ASUTA and partner staff to standards we previously held ourselves to. That is exactly what was supposed to happen.

Ownership is when the community changes the agenda — not just attends the meeting.
Key takeaway

Formal KVP representation on council coordination structures changes which questions get asked.

OwnershipSustainabilityLindi
Back to Field Journal