Heshimu Bahari

Gender-inclusive co-management lands in Dar es Salaam

ASUTA brought community members, government officials and stakeholders together at Kigamboni to rebuild coastal resource management around equal voice and shared monitoring.

AuthorHillary Mkai
Published27 Jul 2024
LocationKigamboni, Dar
Read5 min
Field Dispatch
33→67%
Awareness of gender inclusivity after training
34→66%
Recognising traditional barriers to women
2
Seascapes reached — Dar & Mtwara
01

Why this matters

Coastal communities across Dar es Salaam and Mtwara depend on marine resources for food, income and identity. Yet the decisions about how those resources are harvested, protected and shared have historically been made by a narrow slice of those communities — older male boat-owners — leaving the women who clean, smoke and trade the catch outside the room where the rules are written.

Heshimu Bahari is changing that. The project pairs gender-inclusive co-management with community-led ecological monitoring, on the conviction that management is only as fair — and only as accurate — as the people who set it. Women fishers see different things on the reef than men do. Youth see different things again. Co-management that excludes them is co-management with blind spots.

The training at Kigamboni's Afya House, mirrored by a Mtwara cohort convened at the regional fisheries office, was designed to compress that gap into a single intensive day — and then carry the shift back into BMU meetings the following week.

02

Inside the training

The room was deliberately mixed: BMU chairs and treasurers sat next to women processors and youth fishers; district officials from Kigamboni and Temeke shared tables with their Mtwara counterparts who had travelled up for the joint session. The mix forced conversations that rarely happen — between the people who write fisheries policy and the people who experience it at four in the morning.

The morning session unpacked the cultural and procedural norms that quietly shut women out of decision-making: meeting times that clash with processing hours, election rules that require boat ownership, and the unspoken expectation that women will serve tea while men deliberate. Participants mapped each barrier against a workable fix.

The afternoon session introduced the ecological monitoring toolkit — reef transect basics, mangrove plot counting, and seagrass extent estimation. Every tool was deliberately designed so a community member with a smartphone and one day of practice can run it. Data goes to a shared register reviewed jointly by ASUTA, the BMU and the district fisheries office.

03

What shifted

Pre- and post-training surveys captured the shift in a single day. Awareness of what gender inclusivity actually requires moved from 33% to 67% of participants. Recognition of the specific traditional barriers women face moved from 34% to 66%. Both figures were consistent across Dar and Mtwara cohorts.

More importantly, behavioural commitments followed. Three Dar BMUs scheduled their next general meetings outside processing hours. The Mtwara cohort agreed to publish their next election calendar 90 days in advance, with a 30% women candidate target. A joint Dar-Mtwara WhatsApp group now circulates monitoring data, election notices and GBV referrals across the two seascapes — a peer accountability mechanism the project did not have to design.

When women shape the rules of the fishery, the rules start to fit the fishery.
Key takeaway

Equal representation in co-management isn't a soft target — it's the fastest route to coastal rules that actually work.

GenderCo-managementEcological monitoringDar es Salaam
Back to Field Journal